What type of evaluation is used to assess a candidate's leadership potential?

The assessment of a candidate's leadership potential is best captured through peer and instructor assessments. These evaluations provide a comprehensive view of how a candidate interacts with others, demonstrates leadership qualities, and is perceived by those around them.

In a Navy Officer Candidate School (OCS) context, the ability to lead is not solely based on self-perception or theoretical knowledge; it involves how one is perceived in practice by peers and instructors who are able to witness behaviors, attitudes, and decision-making in real-time. This form of assessment can highlight a candidate's ability to inspire, motivate, and effectively communicate with others, which are all critical traits for a leader.

Practical skills assessments, while important, typically focus on the technical aspect of a candidate's training rather than their inherent leadership qualities. Similarly, written examinations measure knowledge and understanding rather than interpersonal skills and leadership ability. Self-assessment can provide insight into a candidate’s personal views on their leadership but lacks the external perspective that peer and instructor assessments provide, making it less effective for this purpose.